Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

Welcome To get started please read our short introduction.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
This topic has been archived.
To keep discussions in the Skype Community relevant we archive topics that haven't seen activity in the past 6 months. Read more about about archiving
Reply

Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

[ Edited ]

Hi, where are thwe static binaries for Skype 4.1? Have always been installing the static binaries for Linux since they were released.

 

Or rather, how long do we have to wait for a static binary of Skype 4.1, if at all? Static binaries are extremely important for users like me who are not using Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora or OpenSUSE.

 

Please bring back the static binaries, thanks.

LoliDemonEtna
Novel Adventurer
Kudos: 6
Posts: 4
Registered: 15-11-2012
Message 1 of 10 (7,193 Views)

Re: Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

Static binary support has been removed and won't come back, sorry.
Cimmo
Staff
Staff icon
Kudos: 85
Posts: 187
Registered: 06-09-2011
Message 2 of 10 (7,164 Views)

Re: Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

Do you want us to change OS or to move to Google talk?
zhangD
Novel Adventurer
Kudos: 4
Posts: 4
Registered: 09-08-2011
Message 3 of 10 (7,127 Views)

Re: Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

Static version was the only one worked without any problems on any system

nickmz
Casual Adventurer
Kudos: 8
Posts: 5
Registered: 16-11-2012
Message 4 of 10 (7,045 Views)

Re: Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

To support that last statement: Debian 7.0 (multiarch) does not work on amd64.

0 Kudos
asdfasdfasdf
Novel Tourist
Kudos: 0
Posts: 1
Registered: 16-11-2012
Message 5 of 10 (7,036 Views)

Re: Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

I think this is a bad idea. I'm using RHEL 6.3 in my office. I was using the static binary in order to not muck around with the system and shared libraries.
timothy_hayes
Novel Adventurer
Kudos: 4
Posts: 2
Registered: 19-11-2012
Message 6 of 10 (6,879 Views)

Re: Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

Isn't also easier for you to release only the dynamic and static binaries, and let the community to package them instead of supporting five distributions?

The static binaries work perfectly on any system. Can you please justify the choice of not provide them?

You're loosing ground here...

guerrarob
Casual Tourist
Kudos: 6
Posts: 1
Registered: 29-11-2012
Message 7 of 10 (6,630 Views)

Re: Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

It has been removed. :sad:

hi2345
Novel Adventurer
Kudos: 1
Posts: 2
Registered: 26-03-2013
Message 8 of 10 (5,374 Views)

Re: Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

Ha-haaa, welcome to the sad reality! This is Micro$oft...

webdbase
Novel Tourist
Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Registered: 23-09-2013
Message 9 of 10 (3,366 Views)

Re: Static binaries for Skype 4.1?

Wow .. today seems to be the day I say good-bye to Skype. Without static binaries, I can't use it anymore and I am not going to adjust my operating system on M$softs philosophies.

 

But, thanks to the folks at Mozilla, Chrom(ium) and Opera, we have powerful web-based systems at our disposal.  Good bye and thanks for all the fish.

 

Michaela

 

mischmerz
Novel Tourist
Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Registered: 08-08-2014
Message 10 of 10 (1,243 Views)
Reply

© 2015 Skype and/or Microsoft. The Skype name, associated trade marks and logos and the "S" logo are trade marks of Skype or related entities. Use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use and Privacy and Cookie policy.

No emergency calls with Skype
Skype is not a replacement for your telephone and can't be used for emergency calling